Summary
- Snowy states (Minnesota—Minneapolis, New York—Buffalo, Colorado—Denver): HJT or high-bifaciality TOPCon on ground-mount or high-tilt roofs; consider bifacial for albedo from snow; microinverters or DC optimizers for shade from chimneys/vent stacks; robust snow-load racking.
- Windy/hurricane zones (Florida—Miami/Tampa, Texas Gulf—Houston/Corpus Christi, Oklahoma City): TOPCon or HJT are both fine; prioritize high mechanical ratings and hurricane-compliant racking under ASCE 7 and local building codes; prefer string inverter + optimizers to reduce rooftop electronics count in salty/humid climates, or choose microinverters with proven corrosion protection.
- Hot/dry markets (Arizona—Phoenix, Nevada—Las Vegas, California—Palm Springs/Bakersfield): HJT’s lower temperature coefficient can edge out TOPCon; favor string inverter in shaded garage for thermal longevity or microinverters specifically rated for high ambient temps; avoid all-black modules if airflow is poor.
Table 1 — Module technology comparison (TOPCon vs HJT, mono-facial vs bifacial)
| Attribute |
TOPCon (N-type) |
HJT (N-type) |
Bifacial add-on (applies to either) |
| Typical module efficiency |
21–23% |
21.5–23.5% |
N/A (but rear-side adds energy) |
| Temperature coefficient of power,gamma |
about −0.30%/°C to −0.35%/°C |
about −0.25%/°C to −0.30%/°C |
Bifacial does not changegamma |
| Low-light/ diffuse response |
Good |
Very good |
Gains if rear gets sky-ground light |
| Bifaciality factor (if bifacial) |
~70–85% |
~85–95% |
Drives extra yield on rear |
| Degradation/LID/LeTID risk |
Low (N-type is resistant) |
Low |
Same as base tech |
| Mechanical in snow/wind |
Similar; check frame and glass |
Similar; check frame and glass |
Prefer glass-glass for rigidity |
| Cost trend ($/W) |
Slightly lower today |
Slightly higher |
+0.02–0.08/W typical premium |
| Bankability/availability (U.S.) |
Very high, many SKUs |
High, fewer SKUs than TOPCon |
Widely available in utility/commercial; selective for residential |
| Best-fit climates (examples) |
Broad: Boston MA, Detroit MI, Cheyenne WY |
Hot/dry and cold/clear: Phoenix AZ, Denver CO |
Snowy (Minneapolis MN), white roofs (Las Vegas NV), light-colored ground (Salt Lake City UT) |
Table 2 — Inverter architecture (microinverters vs string inverter + DC optimizers)
| Attribute |
Microinverters (MLPE) |
String + DC optimizers (MLPE) |
| Shade tolerance |
Excellent (module-level MPPT) |
Excellent (module-level MPPT) |
| Rapid shutdown (NEC) |
Native |
Native via optimizers |
| Monitoring granularity |
Per-module |
Per-module |
| Rooftop electronics count |
High (1 per module) |
Medium (1 per module + 1–2 string inverters on wall) |
| Warranty (typical) |
20–25 years |
Optimizers 20–25 years; string inverter 10–12 (extended available) |
| Serviceability in snow/hot zones |
Roof work needed to replace units |
Most electronics at ground-level; rooftop optimizers rarely fail |
| Thermal stress in hot markets |
Higher (electronics on roof) |
Lower for central inverter in shaded area |
| Upfront cost |
Higher |
Slightly lower to similar |
| Best-fit climates (examples) |
Complex roofs with shade: Seattle WA, Boston MA, Buffalo NY |
Hot/humid or hurricane: Miami FL, Houston TX; large arrays Phoenix AZ |
Climate-specific playbooks
- Snowy and cold climates (Minnesota—Minneapolis, New York—Buffalo, Massachusetts—Boston, Colorado—Denver, Michigan—Grand Rapids)
- Module choice:
- HJT or high-bifaciality TOPCon. HJT tends to have a slightly better temperature coefficient, so it holds power on very cold, clear days with high irradiance.
- Consider bifacial, especially on ground-mount or flat roofs with tilt, where snow albedo can add 5–20% seasonal gain.
- Prefer glass-glass bifacial modules for stiffness and moisture resistance.
- Inverter choice:
- Microinverters or DC optimizers both work well because chimneys/vents cause localized shading as snow melts unevenly. If truck rolls in winter are a concern, string + optimizers reduce rooftop electronics count.
- Racking and design:
- Verify local ground snow load (e.g., 30–70 psf typical; higher in lake-effect zones like Buffalo). Choose rails, attachments, and clamp spacing to meet jurisdictional loads.
- Tilt 30–40° improves snow shedding. Avoid fully rail-less on high snow unless approved by manufacturer for local loads.
- Bifacial guidance:
- Expect higher winter gains due to snow albedo; use higher module height above roof/ground and clear row spacing to expose the rear.
- Example specs:
- Minneapolis MN: 7 kW HJT bifacial, tilt 35°, microinverters; design for 50+ psf snow load.
- Windy and hurricane-prone regions (Florida—Miami/Tampa, Texas—Corpus Christi/Houston, Louisiana—New Orleans, Oklahoma City OK)
- Module choice:
- Either TOPCon or HJT; prioritize modules with robust frames, additional mid-clamps, and tested design documentation for high 3-sec gusts per local code.
- Consider mono-facial if rear access is blocked; bifacial adds little on dark shingle roofs and increases weight slightly.
- Inverter choice:
- Prefer string inverter + optimizers in coastal, hot, and humid air (fewer active electronics on roof; easier service after storms). If using microinverters, pick models with proven salt-mist and corrosion certifications.
- Racking and design:
- Use ASCE wind zone-specific layouts: closer attachment spacing, perimeter and corner zones with higher clamp density, and certified uplift tables.
- For Florida Building Code jurisdictions (Miami-Dade, Broward), ensure Notice of Acceptance (NOA) where required.
- Example specs:
- Miami FL: 8 kW TOPCon mono-facial, string inverter + optimizers, high-wind racking with perimeter reinforcement.
- Hot/dry and desert environments (Arizona—Phoenix, Nevada—Las Vegas, California—Palm Springs/Bakersfield, New Mexico—Albuquerque, Texas—El Paso)
- Module choice:
- HJT has a small edge due to a better temperature coefficient; both N-type options resist LID/LeTID.
- Favor light frames and good back-ventilation; avoid fully black modules when roof ventilation is poor.
- Bifacial works very well on white TPO flat roofs or reflective gravel—rear gain 5–15%.
- Inverter choice:
- String inverter in shaded garage or north wall to reduce thermal stress, or microinverters with robust derating behavior at high ambient temperatures.
- Design:
- Increase array standoff for airflow; consider DC/AC ratio around 1.2–1.3 to limit clipping while managing heat-induced power drop.
- Example specs:
- Phoenix AZ: 9 kW HJT bifacial on white TPO roof, string inverter + optimizers; higher standoff and wire management for heat.
- Hot/humid coastal climates (Florida—Tampa/Jacksonville, Texas—Houston/Galveston, South Carolina—Charleston)
- Module choice: Either tech works; prioritize PID-resistant, corrosion-tested bills of materials.
- Inverter choice: String + optimizers favored for serviceability and fewer rooftop electronics; if microinverters, ensure conformal coating and salt-mist resistance.
- Racking: Stainless/aluminum hardware with anti-seize; inspect bonding/grounding regularly.
Performance modeling quick refs
- Temperature impact on power:
- P(T) = P_{\\mathrm{STC}}\\,[1 + \\gamma\\,(T_{\\mathrm{cell}} – 25^\\circ\\mathrm{C})], wheregamma is typically −0.25%/°C to −0.35%/°C.
- Estimating cell temperature from ambient and NOCT:
- TmathrmcellapproxTmathrmamb+dfracG800,(mathrmNOCT−20), with G in W/m2.
- Bifacial rear-gain (rule of thumb):
- , where b is bifaciality factor (0.7–0.95),alpha is ground/roof albedo (snow 0.6–0.9; white TPO 0.55–0.8; asphalt 0.1–0.2), fmathrmgeom accounts for height/tilt/row spacing (0.3–0.7 residential).
Decision guide by climate and city/state
| Climate |
States & cities |
Module pick |
Inverter pick |
Notes |
| Snowy/cold |
MN—Minneapolis; NY—Buffalo; CO—Denver; MA—Boston |
HJT or high-bifacial TOPCon; glass-glass |
Microinverters or string+optimizers |
Tilt 30–40°, snow-load racking, leverage snow albedo |
| Wind/hurricane |
FL—Miami/Tampa; TX—Houston/Corpus Christi; LA—New Orleans; OK—Oklahoma City |
TOPCon or HJT mono-facial |
String+optimizers (serviceability); or corrosion-rated microinverters |
High-wind attachments, perimeter zones, local approvals |
| Hot/dry |
AZ—Phoenix; NV—Las Vegas; CA—Palm Springs/Bakersfield; NM—Albuquerque |
HJT preferred; bifacial on reflective roofs |
String+optimizers or high-temp microinverters |
Max airflow, moderate DC/AC ratio, avoid all-black if stagnant air |
| Hot/humid |
FL—Tampa/Jacksonville; TX—Galveston/Houston; SC—Charleston |
Either; PID/corrosion-tested |
String+optimizers |
Hardware selection for corrosion; periodic inspections |
Practical procurement tips
- Verify module frame thickness and clamp compatibility with your chosen rails; check uplift/snow tables for your jurisdiction.
- Ask for temperature-derating curves on inverters; in Phoenix/Las Vegas, prioritize models with higher continuous output rating at \\geq 45^\\circC ambient.
- For bifacial on flat roofs, raise modules and use bright/reflective surfaces; avoid parapet shading; maintain safe walkways.
- In salt-air zones (Miami, Galveston), specify salt-mist (IEC 61701) and ammonia (IEC 62716) tested components; protect connectors and use UV-rated zip ties.